Singapore Airlines B777

Short review

Lounge (SilverKris Lounge in Singapore): 4.5/5 (A great selection of food)

  • This aircraft features Singapore Airline's newer layout. Business Class features the newest Space Bed product. In Economy Class, with the exception of front row seats, all aisle seats have moveable armrests.
  • Read user reviews for Singapore Airlines Boeing 777-300ER (77W) Three Class Submitted by SeatGuru User on 2020/01/04 for Seat 17D.

Cabin: 5/5 (Wide seat with direct access to the aisle; can be converted to a fully flat bed)

Service: 4.5/5 (Good service as expected from Singapore Airlines)

Food and beverages: 5/5 (Delicious meals)

On current fleet, Singapore Airlines operated wide-body extended range aircraft, Boeing 777-300ER. The Singapore Airlines Boeing 777-300ER aircraft is operated on medium to long-haul routes. The Boeing 777-300ER aircraft is designed for a comfortable and reliable journey, no matter how far your travels take you. The Boeing 777-9 won’t be joining the Singapore Airlines fleet until 2024 at the earliest. (Photo: Boeing) New cabin products. In March 2018, as Singapore Airlines was taking delivery of its first Boeing 787-10, CEO Goh Choon Phong revealed that the carrier was developing a brand new First Class and Business Class cabin product for the Boeing.

Pros:

  • Enjoyable overall experience

Cons:

  • Nothing really

Long review

This flight was about a month before lockdown due to COVID-19. Singapore Airlines SQ211 was scheduled to depart Singapore at 10:30 and to arrive in Sydney, Australia, at 21:20. The total flight duration was 7 hours and 50 minutes.

My family and I arrived at Changi Airport about 2 hours before the scheduled departure time. After passing the immigration, we immediately went to the SilverKris Lounge. We have been here a few times, so nothing new. The business class lounge was large and, when we were there, was relatively quiet with plenty of empty seats available. As far as I know, this lounge was quite old. I think it still looks nice and well maintained though.

We picked some cosy seats near the food-serving area and started to enjoy a light breakfast given that we had breakfast in the hotel beforehand (see my Fairmont Singapore review here). The variety of dishes was good. A chef was also on hand to prepare a noodle dish by request. It was nice to enjoy some comfort, warm foods in the morning. The drink selection was very good as well.

Boarding was on time and uneventful. The plane was Boeing 777-300ER, which was equipped with the ‘new’ business class seats. The seats were configured in a 1-2-1 arrangement on each row, giving all passengers direct access to the aisle. The seat could be converted into a wide fully-flat bed. More information about the seat is available from Singapore Airlines website.

We were given the 2 middle seats on the first row. My daughter was less than 2 years old, so she shared a seat with a parent. The first row seats were good because the width of the beds was constant throughout the length of the beds. In subsequent rows, the width at the feet was narrower. Upon reflection, when travelling with a small child, probably it’s better to pick a middle seat and a window seat. The 2 middle seats were completely separated by a kind of low wall, making it difficult to transfer my daughter and her stuff from my seat to my wife’s. Fortunately, one of the window seats on the first row was empty, so in the end we did use a middle seat and a window seat. Before take-off, welcome drinks and warm towels were distributed as per the norm.

Once we were in a cruising altitude, a bowl of nuts and another drink (I ordered a cup of English breakfast tea) were served.

B777-300er

Lunch was then served about 2 hours after take off. The following is the lunch menu in this flight. The ones in asterisks were my order. All the dishes were enjoyable.

Appetiser

  • Silken chicken salad: Sliced poached chicken breast and crunchy vegetables and fresh herb slaw with roasted sesame, miso and honey dressing*

Main course

  • Lamb meatballs in spiced tomato sauce with feta cheese and toasted crostata
  • Fried Hokkien mee with prawn, squid and pork
  • Steamed sliced chicken with mushroom in dried scallop sauce served with braised black moss, long cabbage and snap peas
  • Poached fish with sweet potato, cauliflower and green peas in a rich tomato and coconut garam masala sauce*

Dessert

  • Haagen Dazs cookie and cream ice cream
  • Dark chocolate and ginger cake*

My daughter was rather cranky in this flight, so we could not do much relaxing. The flight attendants gave her a Singapore Airlines bear and a kid’s pack to soothe her. About 1.5 hours before landing, refreshment was served. There were 2 refreshment options:

  • Warm Reuben sandwich: beef pastrami with sauerkraut, cheddar cheese and grilled vegetables
  • Indonesian style fried noodles with chicken and seafood satay

My wife and I ordered both dishes. Again, both were satisfactory, although the presentation perhaps was less delicate. Overall, another enjoyable experience with Singapore Airlines. Its consistency in delivering quality services is indeed commendable.

< Commons:Valued image candidates

Singapore Airlines B777 at Changi Airport.jpg

nominated
Image
Nominated byGerald Waldo Luis (talk) on 2021-02-09 07:10 (UTC)
ScopeNominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jet bridges
Used inGlobal usage

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates.Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say 'I like it!' is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the 'most valuable' criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You typeYou getWhen
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~
  • Comment My comment. -- Example
You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~
  • Info My information. -- Example
You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  • Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  • Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~
  • Question My question. -- Example
You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  • Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.

9V-SWZ

  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces '}}' on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

Singapore Airlines Fleet Of B777 (Active) | Airfleets Aviation

Retrieved from 'https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates/Singapore_Airlines_B777_at_Changi_Airport.jpg&oldid=531570728'